Home > In the News
Interchange: In the News

< More Recent News


“U.S. congressional auditors said it would be hard to identify savings to consumers if lower credit card charges to merchants were to be imposed.”

Reuters
(“US GAO: hard to see consumer savings from card fees,” November 19, 2009)


“Proposals to cut the fees credit card issuers charge merchants would be challenging to implement, the Government Accountability Office said in a report Thursday.”

Dow Jones
(“GAO: Proposals to Cut Credit Card Merchant Fees Hard to Implement,” November 19, 2009)


“Perhaps more vexing, Australian merchants, including retailers, restaurants and airlines, are imposing surcharges for each credit card transaction, even though fees the merchants pay card companies have fallen steeply.”

New York Times
("U.S. Looks to Australia on Curbing Credit Card Fees," November 24, 2009)


"For a small financial institution such as OSU Federal, [Rick Hein, president and CEO of OSU Federal] said, interchange fees are the only way to offset risk factors such as losses from data security breaches."

Corvallis Gazette-Times
("Merchants want credit card fees capped," November 17, 2009)


"With all the extraordinary pressures already facing community banks, restricting their flexibility to extend credit and squeezing their earnings, limiting the income represented by interchange fees would be more cruel and unusual punishment."

BankNews
("Interchange Fees, a Haunting Refrain," November 11, 2009)


“…the back-of-the-cab swipe has emerged as an unlikely savior for New York’s taxi industry, even as other cities’ fleets struggle to find fares in a deep recession.”

New York Times
(“New York’s Cabbies Like Credit Cards? Go Figure,” November 8, 2009)


"But for Anderson, going without credit and debit transactions ‘just wouldn't work for our business model. We would lose so much of our business.’"

New Hampshire Business Review
("Credit card fees add up for small businesses,” November 6, 2009)


     
 

Hear about how interchange fees are an essential part of the credit card system and that any decrease in the fees paid by merchants will just shift the cost to consumers.

WFAA - Good Morning Texas
(“How to Avoid Banking Fees,” November 4, 2009)


“While retailers claim they would pass the savings on to shoppers in the form of lower prices, card companies argue the legislation will make credit less convenient and more costly—and they may be right.”

BusinessWeek
(“Interchange Fees Make Strange Bedfellows,” October 29, 2009)


“For years, merchants have pursued legislation and legal action aimed at lowering or eliminating their costs of accepting electronic payments - claiming this is to protect their customers who would see lower prices as a result. But what it's really about is protecting their profits and shifting costs to the general consumer.”

American Banker
(“VIEWPOINT: Consumers Stand To Lose on Shift In Interchange,” October 23, 2009)


“Meanwhile, the actual percentage of transaction required to be paid as interchange has decreased to the lowest levels we've seen all decade.”

The Atlantic Magazine Online
(“Exchanging Other Fees For Interchange,” October 19, 2009)


“Although the House Financial Services Committee finally held its first discussion Thursday on whether to restrict bank interchange fees, the hearing served chiefly to dispel the idea that the panel was eager to legislate on the issue.”

American Banker
(“Panel Looks at Interchange Fees, But No Bill Imminent,” October 9, 2009)


“If Congress acts on 7-Eleven's misleading petition to put price controls on interchange fees, consumers will pay the price through the reduction of credit card reward programs such as frequent flier miles, and the possible return of annual fees.”

American Banker
(“MasterCard Hits Back On Interchange Fees,” October 1, 2009)


“Contrary to the spin of the 7-Eleven and other big retailers, interchange fees, also called "swipe fees," are only levied on merchants, and none of the major legislation currently before Congress would require retailers to pass on one penny of their resulting savings to consumers.”

Wall Street Journal
(“Don't Let 7-Eleven Give Card Holders a "Big Gulp" of Big Government,” October 1, 2009) Opinion Editorial


"There is absolutely no reason to believe merchants would lower prices if interchange fees were lower.”

US News and World Report
(“Credit Card Fees: 5 Things You Should Know,” September 29, 2009)


“[Commerce restaurant co-owner, Tony Zazula] said the convenience and security afforded by going cashless are well worth the added cost.”

Wall Street Journal
(“New York Restaurant Loses Its Appetite for Cash,” Sept. 11, 2009)


“Officially called the “Credit Card Fair Fee Act,” it ought to be called the Chain Store Swindle Act, because it will boost the profits of the nation’s largest retail chains at the expense of nearly everyone else.”

Atlanta Journal Constitution
(“Credit card bill hurts the little guy,” July 31, 2009) Opinion Editorial


“First, the bill contains no rule requiring retailers to pass along the savings they enjoy from lower interchange fees. More likely, they will pocket the extra profit. Second, the predictable effect of lower interchange rates for retailers will be higher fees on cardholders.”

The Janesville Gazette
(“Don’t let special interests take advantage of credit card fight,” June 25, 2009)


“Conyers’ bill — unlike an earlier version — does not specify that merchants must pass on savings to consumers. They also claim that the push is not being made on behalf of mom and pop business owners, as the merchants’ group claims, but, rather, is being bankrolled by big retailers.”

Politico
(“John Conyers takes aim at interchange fees,” June 10, 2009)


“No one likes to pay fees, but most retailers don’t mind paying a reasonable rate for the services they receive. Consumers would get no benefit from such action. Last year the house judiciary committee rejected a bill that would require retailers to pass on the savings to consumers.”

Tri-State Defender
(“There is nothing fair about the ‘Credit Card Fair Fee Act,” May 29, 2009)


“The moaning merchants claim they are fighting for their customers. I'm not so sure. Isn't it more likely that if their margins are tightening they'll just pocket the amount saved on lower fees?”

The Washington Post
(“We All Pay for the Privilege of Paying with Plastic,” May 28, 2009)


     
 

How YOU Can Protect Your Credit - Simply By Using Your Card. Watch this CNBC clip!

CNBC
(April 13, 2009)


“Government price controls on interchange fees will shrink rewards programs and force increases in annual cardholder fees - as happened in Australia in 2001, when the Reserve Bank of Australia capped interchange fees.”

Washington Times
(“LETTER TO EDITOR: Don't change interchange,” April 12, 2009) By Overstock.com President Jonathan E. Johnson III)


"An antitrust waiver for the merchants would amount to a congressional attempt to rig a deal in the merchants’ favor. If it succeeded, it too would be likely to yield increased fees to customers. And, to repeat, the merchants are not being victimized. They just want a better deal. Which is fine: but they should not get one through an act of Congress."

National Review
(“Credit Unworthy”, July 9, 2008)


"American consumers will be harmed by the Credit Card Fair Fee Act because it is seeded in price controls and price controls cause shortages, reduce competition and innovation, and consequently force consumers to dip further into their wallets."

Washington Times
(“Conyers’ Wallets”, by Eric Grover, May 27, 2008)


"It would be hard to think of a more unqualified example of a free-market success [than the electronic payments system], one that daily proves its value anew to the millions of consumers and merchants who willingly use cards for payment."

The Boston Globe
(“Leave the ‘plastic’ alone” by Jeff Jacoby, April, 30, 2008)


"Crippling Visa and MasterCard through regulation would decrease consumer choice and buying power, and ultimately hurt the merchants who are calling for it."

The New York Sun
(“Crippling Credit Cards” by Philip Kerpen, March 26, 2008)


"The Conyers-Cannon bill requires that . . . if the parties can't agree, a three-person panel of "electronic payment judges" will "determine rates and terms" which shall be binding. That sounds like a price-control regime."

The Wall Street Journal
(“Credit-Card Wars”, March 29, 2008)


"The many credit card companies, their bank clients and the millions of merchants who accept the cards have freely negotiated fees for decades, much as businesses negotiate prices with each other for goods and services."

Washington Times
(“Really Bad Ideas”, by Richard W. Rahn, March 20, 2008)


"The case for regulating card acceptance fees has never been weaker. . . . The payment market has never been more competitive, and network competition, differentiation, and innovation are increasing."

American Banker
(“Viewpoint: Let Market, Not D.C., Set Interchange Rates" by Eric Grover, March 14, 2008)


"Any attempt to call the fees a so-called hidden tax would be similar to trying to misrepresent businesses' rent or salaries for employees as a 'hidden tax' on their customers, the coalition said."

The Deseret Morning News
(“Credit-Card Fight: Measure Would Allow Merchants to Negotiate Fees, but Consumers May Not See the Savings" by Suzanne Struglinski, March 12, 2008)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read news coverage of last year’s “chaotic” mark-up of interchange legislation by the House Judiciary Committee.

Hear from important voices about how to protect consumers like you from the harmful effects of interchange regulation.